I’m currently spending a few days in Sanibel Island, FL for the Intelligent User Interfaces conference (IUI09), where I presented a short paper about some of our old projects (OpenCode and E15:Web). The paper was part of a IUI workshop entitled Visual Interfaces to the Social and Semantic Web, with a keynote from MIT alum David Huynh. One point that struck a chord with attendees was the need for increased focus in visual aesthetics and presentation with respect to technical projects involving the semantic web. Having presented OpenCode at a design conference (AIGA) as well as a technical conference (IUI) placed our work in a unique category. Thus far, visual aesthetics is something that appears to be almost nonexistent here at the conference, which is a bit unfortunate as we’ve known about the gap between design and technical innovation for a very long time. A strong feeling of déjà vu has fallen upon me as I have discussions about this subject that, for me, I was having nearly a decade ago.
The issue is that when doing research that involves the web, these researchers need users. To get users, they need to produce something that people might want to use. If they produce something that’s ugly, difficult to use, and overly esoteric, they’re hard pressed to find anyone that gives a sh*t. Without users, they can’t get results. In my opinion, in order for much of this research to move beyond the prototype stage, researchers need to do more than talk about the need for aesthetics. AFAIK, that’s all that’s ever happened.
That’s not to say that everything here has been atrocious, however. I’ve seen a few visualizations that could be welcome additions to data visualization sites like Information Aesthetics and Visual Complexity with a little polish. In general, however, I think that IUI09 lends at least some confirmation to the notion that intelligence and attractiveness are mutually exclusive.